Ditched bloog engine here in favor of static pelican yesterday, and while I
was able to remember about keeping legacy links working, pretty sure I forgot
about guids on the feed, so apologies to anyone who might care.
Guess it's pointless to fix these now.
All the entries can be found on github now in rst-format, though older ones
might be a bit harder to read in the source, as they were mostly auto-converted
by pandoc and I only checked if they're still rendered correctly to html.
As appengine also made me migrate from master-slave db replication to the shiny
high-replication blobstore, I wonder if hosting static html here now counts as
Right now I was working on python-skydrive module and further integration of MS
SkyDrive into tahoe-lafs as a cloud backend, to keep the stuff you really care
And even if you don't trust SkyDrive to keep stuff safe, you still have to
register your app with these guys, especially if it's an open module, because
"You are solely and entirely responsible for all uses of Live Connect occurring
under your Client ID." and it's unlikely that a generic python interface author
will vouch for all it's uses like that.
What do "register app" mean? Agreeing to yet another "Terms of Service", of course!
Do anyone ever reads these?
What the hell "You may only use the Live SDK and Live Connect APIs to create
software." sentence means there?
Did you know that "You are solely and entirely responsible for all uses of
Live Connect occurring under your Client ID." (and that's an app-id, given out
to the app developers, not users)?
How many more of such "interesting" stuff is there?
I hardly care enough to read, but there's an app for
exactly that, and it's relatively well-known by now.
What might be not as well-known, is that there's now a campaign on IndieGoGo
to keep the thing
alive and make it better.
Please consider supporting the movement in any way, even just by spreading the
word, right now, it's really one of the areas where filtering-out of all the
legalese crap and noise is badly needed.
Having a bit of free time recently, worked a bit on feedjack
web rss reader / aggregator project.
To keep track of what's already read and what's not, historically I've used
js + client-side localStorage approach, which has quite a few advantages:
- Works with multiple clients, i.e. everyone has it's own state.
- Server doesn't have to store any data for possible-infinite number of
clients, not even session or login data.
- Same pages still can be served to all clients, some will just hide
- Previous point leads to pages being very cache-friendly.
- No need to "recognize" client in any way, which is commonly acheived
- No interation of "write" kind with the server means much less
potential for abuse (DDoS, spam, other kinds of exploits).
Flip side of that rosy picture is that localStorage only works in one browser
(or possibly several synced instances), which is quite a drag, because one
advantage of a web-based reader is that it can be accessed from anywhere, not
just single platform, where you might as well install specialized app.
To fix that unfortunate limitation, about a year ago I've added ad-hoc storage
mechanism to just dump localStorage contents as json to some persistent
storage on server, authenticated by special "magic" header from a browser.
It was never a public feature, requiring some browser tweaking and being a
server admin, basically.
Recently, however, remoteStorage project from
unhosted group has caught my attention.
Idea itself and the movement's goals are quite ambitious and otherwise
awesome - to return to "decentralized web" idea, using simple already
available mechanisms like webfinger for service discovery (reminds of Thimbl
concept by telekommunisten.net), WebDAV for storage and
OAuth2 for authorization (meaning no special per-service passwords or similar
But the most interesting thing I've found about it is that it should be
actually easier to use than write ad-hoc client syncer and server storage
implementation - just put off-the-shelf remoteStorage.js to the page (it even
includes "syncer" part to sync localStorage to remote server) and depoy or
find any remoteStorage provider and you're all set.
In practice, it works as advertised, but will have quite significant changes
soon (with the release of 0.7.0 js version) and had only ad-hoc
proof-of-concept server implementation in python (though there's also
in php and node.js/ruby versions), so I
implementation, being basically a glue between simple WebDAV, oauth2app
and Django Storage API (which has
Using that thing in feedjack now (here
, for example) instead of that hacky
json cache I've had with django-unhosted deployed on my server, allowing to
also use it with all the apps with support
Looks like a really neat way to provide some persistent storage for any webapp
out there, guess that's one problem solved for any future webapps I might
deploy that will need one.
With JS being able to even load and use binary blobs (like images) that way
now, it becomes possible to write even unhosted facebook, with only events
like status updates still aggregated and broadcasted through some central
I bet there's gotta be something similar, but with facebook, twitter or maybe
github backends, but as proven in many cases, it's not quite sane to rely on
these centralized platforms for any kind of service, which is especially a
pain if implementation there is one-platform-specific, unlike one
remoteStorage protocol for any of them.
Would be really great if they'd support some protocol like that at some point
But aside for short-term "problem solved" thing, it's really nice to see such
movements out there, even though whole stack of market incentives (which
control over data, centralization and monopolies) is against them.
Following another hiatus from a day job, I finally have enough spare time to
read some of the internets and do something about them.
For quite a while I had lots of quite small scripts and projects, which I
kinda documented here (and on the site pages before that).
I always kept them in some kind of scm - be it system-wide repo for
configuration files, ~/.cFG repo for DE and misc user configuration and ~/bin
scripts, or ~/hatch repo I keep for misc stuff, but as their number grows, as
well as the size and complexity, I think maybe some of this stuff deserves
some kind of repo, maybe attention, and best-case scenario, will even be
useful to someone but me.
So I thought to gradually push all this stuff out to github and/or bitbucket
(still need to learn or at least look at hg for that!). github being the most
obvious and easiest choice, just created a few repos there and started the
migration. More to come.
Still don't really trust a silo like github to keep anything reliably (besides
it lags like hell here, especially compared to local servers I'm kinda used
to), so need to devise some mirroring scheme asap.
Initial idea is to take some flexible tool (hg seem to be ideal, being python
and scm proper) and build a hooks into local repos to push stuff out to
mirrors from there, ideally both bitbucket and github, also exploiting their
metadata APIs to fetch stuff like tickets/issues and commit history of these
into separate repo branch as well.
Effort should be somewhat justified by the fact that such repos will be
geo-distributed backups, shareable links and I can learn more SCM internals by
For now - me on github.